Back
REGULATION
100% confidence
via regex
GAZETTE NOTICE NO. 4677
GAZETTE NOTICE NO. 4677
THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND CO-ORDINATION ACT
(No. 8 of 1999)
REGULATION
PURSUANT to regulation 21 of the Environmental Management
and Co-ordination (Impact Assessment and Audit) Regulations, 2003,
the National Environment Management Authority (NEMA) has
received an Environmental Impact Assessment Study Report for the
above proposed project.
The proponent, Oryx Ltd-Loisaba Conservancy proposes to
develop Loisaba Rhino Sanctuary with an objective of re-establishing
a healthy and thriving population of black rhinos within the
conservancy in line with KWS’s Kenya Rhinos Action Plan. The
proposed project will involve the re-introduction of a founder
population of eastern black rhino (Diceros bicornis michaeli) into a
24,440 acres fenced of (52km perimeter fence) and well secured
sanctuary which will be managed as an Intensive Protection Zone
(IPZ) on plot L.R. No. 8035, Laikipia North Sub-County, Laikipia
County.
The following are the anticipated impacts and proposed mitigation
measures:
Possible Impacts Mitigation Measures
Low participation and
support from
• Initiate and expand public consultation
and disclosure process at the inception
Possible Impacts Mitigation Measures
stakeholders for lack of
adequate information
about the project
and maintain it throughout the project
implementation phases.
• Provide technical and socio-economic
facts about the project.
• Consult widely and adequately with the
neighbouring communities, large scale
ranchers and conservancies and lead
agencies and other stakeholders.
De-vegetation along the
path of the fence line
which could lead to
loss of biodiversity and
externalities such as
soil erosion
• Minimize clearing of vegetation by re-
routing the fence line and re-siting
infrastructure to less vegetated areas.
• Where it cannot be avoided re-vegetate
as much as possible and allow and
induce natural regeneration.
Generation of solid
wastes such as debris,
pieces of plastic,
metals, wires etc.in the
wilderness/pristine
areas
• Ensure separation of biodegradable and
non-biodegradable wastes.
• Encourage use of recyclable materials.
• Provide adequate waste collection bins
and ensure disposal of wastes to
designated dump sites.
• Sell wastes to NEMA licensed
recyclers and fabricators.
• Preserve reusable wastes such as pieces
of metal/steel for future use in
maintenance works.
Injuries to construction
workers
• Appoint and train health and safety
supervisor and committee.
• Provide and enforce use of protective
clothing and equipment workers-PPE.
• Appropriate health and safety measures
shall be implemented as per the OSHA
Act, 2007.
• Keep a general accident inventory at
the site.
• Provide adequate First Aid boxes.
Possible attacks to
workers by wildlife
leading to serious
injuries and deaths and
snake or scorpion bites
in the bush
• Ensure strategic deployment of trained
wildlife scouts and security along the
construction sites.
• Wildlife safety education and training
of the construction workers should be
undertaken.
• Ensure that all construction work is
planned and choreographed in response
to wildlife movement in the
construction sites.
• Unattended public access (unauthorized
non-construction workers) should be
strictly prohibited.
• Provide workmen compensation
insurance to take care of major injuries.
Disturbance to animal
serenity during
construction works
• Plan construction time in response to
movement of wildlife within the
conservancy to avoid or minimize
disturbance and conflict.
Poor selection of
breeders compromising
realization of the
desired population
growth
• Ensure the desirable founder rhinos is
well observed in the selection process
in terms of age and sex structure among
other key considerations.
• Removals with a 50:50 sex ratio are
usually preferred.
Possible deaths of rhinos
and other undesirable
and unintended effects
• Strictly adhere to KWS Rhino
Translocation and Release Guidelines
13th May, 2021 THE KENYA GAZETTE
Possible Impacts Mitigation Measures
such as increased stress
levels due to unfamiliar
habitat
and Protocol and global best practices.
• Ensure full involvement of KWS Rhino
Office during identification,
translocation and release.
• Implement the localized Rhino
Management Plan and ensure it is in
line with KWS practices.
• Undertake multi-agency pre-
translocation planning and implement
the recommendations.
• It is desirable that all founder rhinos
should be translocated at once or over a
short period to minimise the increased
chances of fighting mortalities that can
occur when additional rhinos are
released into areas with established
resident rhinos.
• Determining suitable release sites and
specific areas for release based on
screening and assessing habitat quality,
estimated medium-term ecological
carrying capacity (ECC), security and
management capacity in potential
recipient areas.
• Ensure adequate and appropriate
training of staff.
Possible exposure of
rhinos to security
threats and risks which
may lead to poaching
incidences
• Ensure implementation of the rhino
security management and strategies.
• Establish an extensive yet intensive
intelligence network which could also
involve the local communities.
• Liaise with the government security
network and lead agencies in crafting
and implementing security strategies.
• Implement the Security Assessment
recommendations and strategies by
KWS as envisaged.
• Maintain and consistently improve the
proposed project area’s security team’s
preparedness, response and equipment.
• Continue with the random and
impromptu checks.
• The team including armed NPR unit,
rapid response teams, a canine unit
comprising four tracker dogs and a
Lion Ranger team to be maintained and
their skills and capacity
upgraded/improved in response to
emerging security threats and
situations.
• Use of SMART (Species Monitoring
and Reporting Tool) software should be
maintained/improved while emerging
and contemporary security software be
explored and applied.
Forage depletion due to
competition with the
high population of
elephants and other
wildlife for browse
material, salt licks and
water
• Craft and implement an aggressive
elephant monitoring programme based
on the ECC with the aim of reducing
their impacts.
• Design medium to long term expansion
plan beyond the current sanctuary area
as well as plan to create corridor among
existing rhino sanctuaries.
Possible risks of disease
outbreak among the
rhinos threatening their
population
• Conduct a comprehensive veterinary
assessment on disease risks and adopt
the recommendations.
• Recruit a resident veterinarian to
oversee disease monitoring and
management.
Possible Impacts Mitigation Measures
Possible water supply
scarcity/
inaccessibility, and / or
quality challenges
• The water points (natural and
constructed) should be maintain and
improved for continuous supply in
quantity and quality.
• The water quantity and quality should
be monitored regularly and corrective
measures put in place as appropriate.
• The design of the fence should ensure
enclosure of adequate springs as they
are the most stable source of good
quality water.
Interference with
wildlife migratory
corridors and free
wildlife movement
around and within the
ecosystem
• Align the fence to ensure that nine
migratory corridors remain to allow
free movement of wildlife within and
outside the proposed project area and
the surrounding conservancies and the
larger Laikipia-Samburu Ecosystem.
• The fence design should allow free
movement of all other wildlife within
and outside the Sanctuary apart from
the rhinos.
• Observe game management principles.
Human/ wildlife
conflicts as a result
inefficient/ineffective
fence due to lack of
proper fence
maintenance
• The Loisaba Fence Maintenance Team
should provide consistent monitoring
and maintenance of the sanctuary’s
fence.
• Put in place a fence performance
monitoring system.
• Ensure adequate resources and required
equipment are available for fence
maintenance and upgrading.
The full report of the proposed project is available for inspection
during working hours at:
(a) Principal Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forestry, NHIF
Building, 12th Floor, Ragati Road, Upper Hill, P.O. Box 30126–
00100, Nairobi.
(b) Director General, NEMA Popo Road, off Mombasa Road, P.O.
Box 67839–00200, Nairobi.
(c) The County Director of Environment, Laikipia County.
NEMA invites members of the public to submit oral or written
comments within thirty (30) days from the date of publication of this
notice to the Director General, NEMA, to assist the Authority in the
decision-making process for this project.
MAMO B. MAMO,
Director-General,
MR/1721123 National Environment Management Authority.
Dated the 13th May, 2021.
MAMO B. MAMO,
Director-General, National Environment Management Authority.
Extracted Entities (1)
previous_gazette_ref
4677
Details
- Act / Legislation
- THE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND CO-ORDINATION ACT
- Reference
- No. 8 of 1999
- Signed By
- MAMO B. MAMO
- Title
- Director-General, National Environment Management Authority
- Date Signed
- 13th May 2021
- Page
- 26
- Extraction Method
- regex
Source Gazette
Vol. CXXIII No. 104
Published 10th February 2021